English

rapport

Second management recommendation invitations submitted to case studies

()

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4580234

1 Akvaplan-niva (nåværende ansatt)

Forfattere (27)

  1. Jónas R. Viðarsson
  2. Ragnhildur Friðriksdóttir
  3. Sigurður Ö Ragnarsson
  4. Karin Olsen
  5. Nina Mikkelsen
  6. Michaela Aschan
  7. Sonia Doblado Martín
  8. Alexandre Rodriguez
  9. Duarte Fernández Vidal
  10. Rosa Chapela
  11. Marta Ballesteros
  12. Lidvard Grønnevet
  13. Arved Staby
  14. Benvindo Fonseca
  15. Khallahi Brahim
  16. Elimane Kane
  17. Mammadou Diallo
  18. Ndiaga Thiam
  19. Modou Thiaw
  20. Roucou Yannick
  21. Vincent Lucas
  22. Karim Erzini
  23. Kim Stobberup
  24. Gonzalo Ojea
  25. Francisco Teijeria
  26. Khalid Elkalay
  27. Khalil Karima

Abstract

This report contains the 2nd management recommendation (MR) invitations submitted to the case studies in the FarFish project i.e. the high-seas fisheries in SW-Atlantic and SE-Atlantic, and the SFPA fisheries in Cape Verde, Senegal, Mauritania and Seychelles. The purpose of these MR invitations is to offer selected operators (resource users) the opportunity to develop MRs following the “second draft general guidelines for making MRs” presented in FarFish deliverable 3.5. The approach presented in the guidelines are based on principles of results-based management (RBM), where the responsibility for fisheries management is partly transferred to the resource users, provided that they meet with necessary requirements set forth by the authorities and provide documentation confirming implementation and achievement of specified management objectives. The advantages of such an approach include facilitation of more bottom-up style of management where the actual resource users and other stakeholders are involved. This approach is likely to increase the sense of ownership, by the resource users, in the management. Other advantages are for example increased transparency, as well as reduced costs and increased coverage of monitoring, control and surveillance. The MR invitations follow up on a pre-invitation dialogues where the basics of the approach have been introduced. The MR invitations include a short description of what is to be the focus of the MRs, identification of the main actors and their roles and responsibilities in the process, details on the current status of the fishery and finally the identification of so-called Outcome Targets (OTs) that are performance goals that the MRs are to meet.

View in NVA